Tag Archives: Vienna Circle
Philosophy’s Refugees
Last night, I finished reading David Edmond’s book, the one subtitled The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle, to which he gave the more sensational title, The Murder of Professor Schlick. Moritz Schlick was in his forties when he … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, agnosticism, alienation, American politics, anthropology, anti-semitism, appreciation, art, art of living, atheism, authenticity, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, bureaucracy, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, ethnicity, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, fatherhood, female power, femininity, feminism, filial piety, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master/slave relation, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, mysticism, Nihilism, nineteenth-century, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, racism, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, remembrance, repairing the culture, roles, romanticism, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, Truth, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged academic politics, academic refugees, antisemitism and Vienna Circle, Austria’s modern political history, Can we know the past?, classical vs modern relation of philosophy students to teachers, confining truth to sense experience, consistency proof, conventional existence, Das Man, David Edmond’s The Murder of Professor Schlick, following the argument where it leads, foundationalism in philosophy, Heidegger and Husserl, Heidegger Rector at Freiburg, Heidegger’s authenticity, Heidegger’s Being toward Death, Heidegger’s betrayal of Husserl, Heidegger’s Black Notebooks, Heidegger’s Jewish students, Heidegger’s nazism, honoring one’s mentors, How reliable is history?, judgements of character, Karl Popper, knowledge of imperceptible things, knowledge of probability, knowledge of the external world, Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, logical positivism, losing the argument and winning the truth, mathematical logic, meaninglessness for Vienna Circle, metaphysics as nonsense, nazification of Vienna, occupational hazard, philosophic reductionism, philosophy and good character, political history of Vienna, refugees, refugees from nazism, Rudolf Carnap, scientific criteria of truth, shallow existence, simplification isn’t simple, Socrates Plato and Aristotle honoring their mentors, soundness of character judgements, The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle, the test of argument, truth and validity for the Vienna Circle, twentieth-century European political history, Vienna Circle, Vienna Circle against metaphysics, Vienna Circle and nonsense, Vienna Circle as refugees, Vienna Circle Certitudes vs Heideggerian Authenticity, Vienna Circle’s exclusion of nonsense, Vienna Circle’s philosophic claims, Vienna’s modern political history, winning or losing the argument, winning or losing the truth, winning the argument and losing the truth, World War II refugees
|
Leave a comment
As Philosophy Goes …
I hold the view, borrowed from G. W. F. Hegel, the nineteenth-century’s primo philosopher of history, that philosophy plays an oversized role in shaping human events. So do earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, global warming periods, plagues and nasty fights over water … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, anthropology, anti-semitism, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, bureaucracy, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, eighteenth century, erotic life, eternity, ethics, ethnicity, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, medieval, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, motherhood, mysticism, nineteenth-century, non-violence, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, repairing the culture, roles, romance, romantic love, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, slave, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged academic martyrdom, academic power struggles, American Philosophical Association, Ann Gary, APA’s Proceedings and Addresses, are people like machines, brainwashing, can machines replace people, can you live inside your philosophy, Catholic convert, cognitive psychology, communicating across difference, competition between underdogs, David Chalmers, Eleonore Stump, Epistemology, facial recognition, fallacy of scattershot condemnation, fashionable ideas, feminist philosophy, feminist quarrels, forced confessions, groupthink, Hegel, human knowledge vs AI, human suffering, human thinking and AI, Hypatia, idealized knowledge, Incommensurable Otherness, intellectual autobiography, Jennifer Nagel, John Dewey Lectures, Jonathan Schaffer, learning models, logical positivists, Mariana Ortega, mechanist materialism as worldview, medieval logic, metaphysics, mind/body problem, moral one-upmanship, opposition to women in philosophy, people compared to machines, philosophical account of ultimacy, philosophical fashions, philosophical friendship, philosophizing about human suffering, philosophy and nonquantifiable experience, philosophy and the future, philosophy and worldviews, philosophy as a profession, philosophy as a truth-seeking discipline, philosophy as cultural influence, philosophy as life-shaping, philosophy lectures, philosophy of history, philosophy transcends the tyranny of fashion, philosophy's political influence, physicalism, physicalism and reductionism, physicalist worldview, Plato's view of knowledge, prediction errors, primary and secondary qualities, primary qualities, pulling moral rank, Reign of Terror, right opinion vs knowledge in Plato, Saint Augustine, Salem witch trials, sexism, the politics of philosophy, theory of everything, thinking machines, Thomas Aquinas, true knowledge vs opinion, Vienna Circle, wisdom as true knowledge, wisdom knowledge vs everyday knowledge, women in philosophy
|
Leave a comment
Not Getting Over It
When one has been through a difficult passage in the course of one’s life, it’s common to get the collective advice from Job’s Comforters: get over it! I’ve always thought that was very bad advice – except maybe for horses … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Bible, Biblical God, bigotry, books, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, courage, courtship, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, femininity, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, Idealism-, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, mysticism, ontology, oppression, past and future, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romance, romantic love, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged a man’s kiss is his signature, Abigail L. Rosenthal’s A Good Look at Evil, academic conference, academic presentation, academic tact, anthropology, anti-Nazi intellectual, APSA, attuned people, bearing false witness, believing defamations, biblical Israel, Biblical self-criticism, connoisseurship, continental beauty, culture and spirituality, difficult life passage, direction and order in history, discerning evil, discreet romantic attachment, disparagement of Biblical Israel, Ephrussi family, Eric Voegelin Society, erotic assessments, escaping the Gestapo, EVS conference in LA, falsely accusing Jews, get over it, get through it, get to the bottom of it, good and evil, groupthink, high society romance, intellectual originality, intellectual tact, Job’s comforters, Los Angeles, moral neutrality as social science, neuropathy treatments, neuropathy treatments at Loma Linda, openmindedness, openness with discernment, original thinker, patrons of the arts, perennial anti-semitism, Pharisaic parables, Pharisaic self-criticism, philosophy of history, political philosopher, political science conference, political theorist, poltical science, presenting academic paper, pulling punches, Rabbi Jesus, reductionism and anti-reductionism, secret love, self-criticism and spirituality, slander is always believed, sociology, spiritual breakthroughs, spirituality in culture, spiritually open, study of cultures, suffer it through, the study of human beings, Vienna Circle, Voegelin and Jewish thinkers, Voegelin and Martin Buber, Voegelin as anti-Nazi, Voegelin’s Israel and Revelation, Voegelin’s Order and History, well-meant platitudes, windows of the soul
|
Leave a comment
