Tag Archives: metaphysics as nonsense
Philosophy’s Refugees
Last night, I finished reading David Edmond’s book, the one subtitled The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle, to which he gave the more sensational title, The Murder of Professor Schlick. Moritz Schlick was in his forties when he … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, agnosticism, alienation, American politics, anthropology, anti-semitism, appreciation, art, art of living, atheism, authenticity, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, bureaucracy, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, ethnicity, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, fatherhood, female power, femininity, feminism, filial piety, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master/slave relation, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, mysticism, Nihilism, nineteenth-century, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, racism, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, remembrance, repairing the culture, roles, romanticism, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, Truth, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged academic politics, academic refugees, antisemitism and Vienna Circle, Austria’s modern political history, Can we know the past?, classical vs modern relation of philosophy students to teachers, confining truth to sense experience, consistency proof, conventional existence, Das Man, David Edmond’s The Murder of Professor Schlick, following the argument where it leads, foundationalism in philosophy, Heidegger and Husserl, Heidegger Rector at Freiburg, Heidegger’s authenticity, Heidegger’s Being toward Death, Heidegger’s betrayal of Husserl, Heidegger’s Black Notebooks, Heidegger’s Jewish students, Heidegger’s nazism, honoring one’s mentors, How reliable is history?, judgements of character, Karl Popper, knowledge of imperceptible things, knowledge of probability, knowledge of the external world, Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorems, logical positivism, losing the argument and winning the truth, mathematical logic, meaninglessness for Vienna Circle, metaphysics as nonsense, nazification of Vienna, occupational hazard, philosophic reductionism, philosophy and good character, political history of Vienna, refugees, refugees from nazism, Rudolf Carnap, scientific criteria of truth, shallow existence, simplification isn’t simple, Socrates Plato and Aristotle honoring their mentors, soundness of character judgements, The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle, the test of argument, truth and validity for the Vienna Circle, twentieth-century European political history, Vienna Circle, Vienna Circle against metaphysics, Vienna Circle and nonsense, Vienna Circle as refugees, Vienna Circle Certitudes vs Heideggerian Authenticity, Vienna Circle’s exclusion of nonsense, Vienna Circle’s philosophic claims, Vienna’s modern political history, winning or losing the argument, winning or losing the truth, winning the argument and losing the truth, World War II refugees
|
Leave a comment
Deep versus Shallow
One time I asked David Stove, a philosopher at Sydney University’s Department of Traditional and Modern Philosophy, whether he thought there were such things as foundational truths – propositions that underlay and supported the edifice of human knowledge. … Continue reading →
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, agnosticism, alienation, American politics, anthropology, anti-semitism, appreciation, art, art of living, atheism, authenticity, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Bible, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, bureaucracy, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, ethnicity, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, fatherhood, female power, femininity, feminism, films, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, motherhood, mysticism, Nihilism, nineteenth-century, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, remembrance, repairing the culture, roles, romance, romantic love, romanticism, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, slave, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, Truth, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged adolescent depth, agonizing depth, Albert Einstein, anti-semitism and the Vienna Circle, assimilating inherited stuff, assimilating one’s inheritance, Athenian Theater, barefoot tree climbing, British philosophizing, children dueling, Continental philosophizing, Darwin and the irrational, Darwinian racism, David Stove, decluttering a life, decluttering life review, deep calls to deep, deep vs shallow, Department of Traditional and Modern Philosophy at Sydney University, disposing of inherited things, dueling with branches, emotional attachments vs simplifying, family inheritance, foundational truths, Frank Ramsey, Freud and modernity, Freud and the zeitgeist, Freud as fashionable, Freudian seduction, heroes and villains, how a gentleman reads philosophy, ideal simplicity and real life complexity, ignorance is bliss, implausablity of Oedipus Complex, improvised furniture, influence of theories, internalizing Freud, keeping it simple, keeping life simple and intelligible, kid stuff, kid’s naïveté vs adolescent depth, life lessons of childhood, living on a shoestring, losing your nerve, Max Planck, metaphysics as nonsense, minimalist life strategy, modernism and Sigmund Freud, modernity and the Vienna Circle, naïveté of children, Niels Bohr, Oedipus and Jocasta, Oedipus complex, Oedipus kills his father, Oedipus marries his mother, Oedipus Rex, philosophical depth vs kid stuff, philosophy and scientific progress, philosophy’s cultural imprint, pre-nazi Vienna, profaning the sacred, psychoanalysis, psychoanalysis as a science, quest for foundations, Ramsey’s Oedipus Complex, search for foundations, selling the Brooklyn Bridge, Sophocles, spareness vs the intrusions of stuff, Sydney University, the best and the brightest, the Cambridge Apostles, The Murder of Professor Schlick: The Rise and Fall of the Vienna Circle by David Edmonds, the Trad and Mod Staff Club, the verification principle, The Vienna Circle, the Vienna Circle contra metaphysics, theory of mathematics, tragedy of King Oedipus, transvaluation of values, Vienna Circle and meaninglessness, well-balanced superficiality, Werner Heisenberg, winning by keeping your nerve
|
1 Comment
