Tag Archives: other minds
Virtue Epistemology and Feeling Normal
Virtue Epistemology and Feeling Normal I’ve got a funny feeling this is not a trendy topic. Oh well. Here goes. Epistemology, the logos of episteme, is philosophy’s term for theory (or theories) of knowledge. In modern times (that is, from … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art of living, autonomy, books, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, Industrial Revolution, institutional power, Jews, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, memoir, memory, mind control, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, novels, ontology, oppression, past and future, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, seventeenth century, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theology, time, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged 17th century philosophy, academic philosophy, ancient Athens, arête, Aristotle's Laws of Thought, Aristotle's Metaphysics, brain in vat, Copernicus, credibility, defamation, Descartes, empirical trust, epistemological optimism, epistemological pessimism, Epistemology, fallacy of hasty generalization, G.E. Moore, good judgment, gossip, human sociality, inauthenticity, inferential knowledge, intellectual excellence, intellectual trust, intellectual virtue, internalizing insult, internalizing prejudice, Jewish anxiety, judging correctly, Kepler and Galileo, knowledge claims, modern philosophy, modern science, modern skepticism, normality, other minds, other-directedness, philosophy course, political animal, postulating hypothesis, presumed guilty, presumed innocent, presumption of guilt, pretended skepticism, scientific method, self-directedness, self-trust, sense of security, skepticism, slander, social creatures, telling right from wrong, telling truth from falsity, the human norm, The Longest Hatred, theory of knowledge, thick hide, thick-skinned, thin-skinned, trendy topics, virtue epistemology, virtue ethics
|
Leave a comment
Good Philosophy Gets You to the Bathroom in Time
Good Philosophy Gets You to the Bathroom in Time In 1988, the atheist philosopher A. J. Ayer published an article for Britain’s widely read Sunday Telegraph, titled, “What I Saw When I Was Dead.” In the atheist circles in which … Continue reading →
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, cities, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, journalism, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, male power, masculinity, memoir, memory, mind control, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, oppression, past and future, philosophy, political, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, scientism, secular, self-deception, sex appeal, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged A.J. Ayer, Abigail L. Rosenthal's "What Ayer Saw When He Was Dead", afterlife vision, all-gender bathrooms, anatomy and destiny, atheist circles, atheist philosopher, blackballed, British Humanist Association, calling one’s bluff, clinically dead, clubbable, conceptual jigsaw puzzle, Einstein’s space and time, empiricism, external world, laws of nature, logical positivism, men’s room, NDE, near death experience, near-death vision, objective, other minds, philosophic courage, philosophical view, philosophical worldview, Philosophy: The Journal of The Royal Institute of Philosophy, professional reputation, professional taboo, Rationalist Press Association, saying the unsayable, self-refutation, sense data, social construction of reality, social risk, social standing, social taboo, South Place Ethical Society, space and time, space out of joint, space/time world, subjective, Sunday Telegraph, the natural sciences, theoretical anomalies, time out of joint, unlivable worldview, untenable worldview, women’s room
|
4 Comments
