Tag Archives: brain in vat
Virtue Epistemology and Feeling Normal
Virtue Epistemology and Feeling Normal I’ve got a funny feeling this is not a trendy topic. Oh well. Here goes. Epistemology, the logos of episteme, is philosophy’s term for theory (or theories) of knowledge. In modern times (that is, from … Continue reading →
Posted in "Absolute Freedom and Terror", Absurdism, Academe, Action, Alienation, American Politics, Anthropology, Art of Living, Autonomy, books, Cities, Class, conformism, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Eternity, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, exploitation, Faith, Fashion, Femininity, Feminism, Freedom, Friendship, Gender Balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, Guilt and Innocence, Health, Hegel, hegemony, Heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, History, history of ideas, Idealism, Ideality, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Immorality, Industrial Revolution, Institutional Power, Jews, Judaism, Law, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Male Power, Martyrdom, Masculinity, master, Memoir, memory, Mind Control, Modernism, Moral action, Moral evaluation, Moral psychology, morality, novels, Ontology, Oppression, Past and Future, Phenomenology of Mind, Philosophy, Political Movements, politics of ideas, post modernism, Power, presence, promissory notes, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Public Intellectual, Reading, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, scientism, secular, Seduction, self-deception, seventeeth century, social climbing, social construction, Social Conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, Spirituality, status, Suffering, Terror, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, the profane, the sacred, Theology, Time, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, victimhood, victims, Violence, War, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged 17th century philosophy, academic philosophy, ancient Athens, arête, Aristotle's Laws of Thought, Aristotle's Metaphysics, brain in vat, Copernicus, credibility, defamation, Descartes, empirical trust, epistemological optimism, epistemological pessimism, Epistemology, fallacy of hasty generalization, G.E. Moore, good judgment, gossip, human sociality, inauthenticity, inferential knowledge, intellectual excellence, intellectual trust, intellectual virtue, internalizing insult, internalizing prejudice, Jewish anxiety, judging correctly, Kepler and Galileo, knowledge claims, modern philosophy, modern science, modern skepticism, normality, other minds, other-directedness, philosophy course, political animal, postulating hypothesis, presumed guilty, presumed innocent, presumption of guilt, pretended skepticism, scientific method, self-directedness, self-trust, sense of security, skepticism, slander, social creatures, telling right from wrong, telling truth from falsity, the human norm, The Longest Hatred, theory of knowledge, thick hide, thick-skinned, thin-skinned, trendy topics, virtue epistemology, virtue ethics
|
Leave a comment