Tag Archives: women’s vulnerability
Getting Sex All Wrong
There are some who believe that “You are what you eat.” Differing from those people, I believe that “You are what you think.” And about The Big Subject, what philosophers think and write about sex can trickle down to … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, agnosticism, alienation, American politics, anthropology, anti-semitism, appreciation, art, art of living, atheism, authenticity, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Bible, Biblical Archeology, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, bureaucracy, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, Confessions of a Young Philosopher, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, Desire and Authenticity, dialectic, eighteenth century, erotic life, eternity, ethics, ethnicity, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, fatherhood, female power, femininity, feminism, filial piety, films, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, Industrial Revolution, institutional power, Jesus, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, Married Philosophers Discuss Confessions, martyrdom, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, medieval, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, mortality vs immortality, motherhood, mysticism, Nihilism, nineteenth-century, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, power games, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, racism, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, remembrance, Renaissance, repairing the culture, roles, romance, romantic love, romanticism, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, seventeenth century, sex appeal, sexuality, slave, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, Suicide, terror, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, Trauma, Truth, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged abortions and risk, academic philosophers on sex, Aristotle on treating people appropriately, Benatar’s Two Views of Sexual Ethics: Promiscuity Pedophilia and Rape, biological meaning of sex, casual sex, casual sex as including sexual deviance, Christina’s Are We Having Sex or What?, commodification of intimacy, commodification of sex, conceptual questions re sex, consent as distinct from desire, counting coups in sex experience, defining what counts as sex, desire and sex, disillusioned women, eligible partners, eligible sex partners, evolution and contraception, evolution and homosexuality, evolution and human flourishing, evolution and in vitro fertilization, evolution and masturbation, evolution and nothing-but-ism, evolution and reductionism, fear of pregnancy, going along to get along, Greta Christina, intimacy and relationships, Kant vs Aristotle on moral questions, love and sex, love and the essence of sex, manipulative sadness, marriage and the role of great sex, marriage as exclusive and committal, marriage as life-long commitment, Micah Newman’s A Realist Sexual Ethics, misleading scene-setter for studying sex, opinions no woman would hold, oversimplifying evolution, parenting and marriage, philosophers influence the culture, philosophers influence the zeitgeist, philosophical defense of monogamy, pleasure vs the purpose of sex, promiscuity, promiscuity and addiction, promiscuity and regrets, rape, rationales re sex, religious defense of monogamy, reproduction as sex’s defining essence, reproduction as the purpose of sex, scene-setting for philosophic discussion of sex, scoring in sex, seductive sadness, sex and disease, sex and evolution, sex and getting real, sex and how to live, sex and its rationales, sex and love, sex and philosophers, sex and physical risks, sex and psychological wounds, sex and real life, sex and reputation, sex and social standing, sex and why we live, sex as a conceptual question, sex as expressive of loving attachment, sex as significant, sex changing a relationship, sex requiring consent, sexual body count, sexual disillusionment, sexual encounter defined, sexual permissiveness, sexual reckoning, significant sex vs casual sex, social mores as protective, social mores as protective of women, suspending disbelief, suspending judgment in philosophic discussion, suspending judgment in philosophizing re sex, suspending moral judgment in philosophizing, suspending moral judgment in philosophizing re sex, The Big Subject, The Philosophy of Sex 2023, the sexual revolution, traditional view of the role of sex, treating women as a means, Was it sex or not?, What counts as having sex?, What makes an essay philosophical?, When is an essay on sex philosophical?, women and getting threatened, women as means to biological end, women being disgusted, women being offended, women being scorned, women’s erotic vulnerability, women’s vulnerability, You are what you eat, you are what you think
|
1 Comment
Abortion on My Mind
Abortion on My Mind First, let’s approach this vexing topic from the metaphysical side. If we adopt the Aristotelian view of gestation (a view that, if I’m correct, was part of the thinking of Christian philosophers in the High … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, Biblical God, bigotry, books, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, courage, courtship, cultural politics, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, male power, master/slave relation, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, motherhood, ontology, oppression, past and future, philosophy, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romance, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, victimhood, victims, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged Abigail L Rosenthal’s Feminism Without Contradictions, Aristotelian view, asymmetry of the sexes, Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Prey: Immigration, biology and feminism, biology and rights, biology and social constructs, chivalry and the Titanic’s sinking, Islam and the Erosion of Women’s Rights, male protectiveness, men as the enemy, metaphysics and social questions, metaphysics and the unborn, mother’s body, Phyllis Chesler’s An American Bride in Kabul, potentiality to actuality, right to choose, right to life, rights of the unborn, Roe v Wade, Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, sisterhood is powerful, social coarsening, status of the unborn, status of zygote, Terri Shiavo, unsisterly women, when is it a person, when soul enters body, women and children first, women in Iran, women’s rights, women’s social power, women’s standing, women’s suffrage, women’s vulnerability
|
3 Comments
