Tag Archives: social intelligence
I Dreamed I Saw Hitler Last Night
Make no mistake, in my whole life Hitler has never appeared in any dream or daydream of mine. I don’t think about Hitler. He’s not in the iconography of my consciousness. This was also the first time I’d seen him … Continue reading →
Posted in "Absolute Freedom and Terror", Absurdism, Academe, Action, Afterlife, Alienation, American Politics, Anthropology, Art, Art of Living, Atheism, Autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Biblical God, bigotry, books, bureaucracy, Chivalry, Christianity, conformism, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, Courtship, cults, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Eternity, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, exploitation, Faith, Fashion, Female Power, Femininity, Feminism, Freedom, Friendship, Gender Balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, Guilt and Innocence, Health, Hegel, hegemony, Heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, History, history of ideas, ID, idealism, Ideality, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Immorality, Immortality, Institutional Power, Jews, Journalism, Judaism, Law, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Male Power, Martyrdom, Masculinity, master, master/slave relation, Memoir, memory, Messianic Age, Mind Control, Modern Women, Modernism, Moral action, Moral evaluation, Moral psychology, morality, Mortality, Mysticism, non-violence, novels, Ontology, Oppression, pacifism, Past and Future, Peace, Phenomenology of Mind, Philosophy, Political, Political Movements, politics, politics of ideas, post modernism, Power, presence, promissory notes, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Public Intellectual, radicalism, Reading, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, Romance, Romantic Love, Romanticism, science, scientism, secular, Seduction, self-deception, Sex Appeal, Sexuality, slave, social climbing, social construction, Social Conventions, social ranking, Sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, Spirituality, status, status of women, Suffering, Terror, terrorism, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, the profane, the sacred, Theism, Theology, Time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, Violence, War, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged academic conference, academic discourse, academic discourse and shunning, academic discourse and unspoken taboos, academic lecture, academic lecture Q and A, academic ostracism, ancient Christianity, ancient Judaism, ancient theological quarrels, archaic thought layers, beyond feminism, body language of discourse, buried thought layers, conversion and rabbinic Judaism, coping strategy, dialectic and self-defense, dialogue and avoidance, disarming body language, early Christian saints, Early Christianity, feminine invisibility, feminism and social intelligence, first-century Judaism, following the argument, handling a situation, healthy discussion, historical imagination, instructive dreams, Jerusalem's Western Wall and the speaking stones, Jews and early Jesus movement, Jews and the afterlife, Jews during the time of Jesus, Judaism conspicuously unmentioned, Judaism misrepresented, looking for an opening, men and women vs feminist abstractions, mutual forgiveness, non-threatening body language, not rising to the bait, political dream, politics of religion, pre-feminist interactions, real-life advice for women, real-life lessons, Saint Ambrose, Saint Ambrose and Jews, Saint Augustine, Saint Augustine and Jews, side-stepping ideological posturing, significant dream, situation handled, situation to be handled, situational choreography, social death, social erasure, social intelligence, Socratic dialectic and the academy, Socratic dialectic and women, staying in the game, the choreography of social power, the dance of professional relations, the dance of social relations, the Righteous Gentiles, theological omissions, theology conference, theology lecture and questions, truth-seeking in the academy, unhelpful ideology, Western religion’s Jewish foundation, World War II newsreels
|
Leave a comment
Persecution and the Art of Writing
Persecution and the Art of Writing That’s the catchy title of a book published in the 1950’s by a man named Leo Strauss – initially derided, later enormously influential. Outside philosophy and political theory, Strauss’s name is not generally … Continue reading →
Posted in Action, Art, Art of Living, books, Contradictions, Courtship, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Feminism, history of ideas, Literature, Love, Philosophy, Political, politics, politics of ideas, public facade, Public Intellectual, Reading, relationships, Roles, Romantic Love, social construction, Social Conventions, status, status of women, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged candor, candor in courtship, conspiracy theory, coquetry, courtship, dialectic, diplomacy, emigre philosophers, emigres, esotericism, Eugenics, exoteric writing, gauging the audience, hidden doctrine, hidden views, history of ideas, integrity, intellectual integrity, intellectuals, Leo Strauss’s Persecution and the Art of Writing, oral teaching, Palestinian student, people pleasing, philosophic training, philosophy, Plato's Phaedrus, Plato's Republic, political realism, political science, political theory, public intellectuals, rhetoric, saying the right thing, secret doctrine, social blunders, social intelligence, speech and silence, state managed reproduction, straight shooting, tact, the ideal state, The Woman Question, Thought Crimes, trial and error, truth-seekers, women in philosophy, writing in code
|
2 Comments