Tag Archives: Eugenics
Persecution and the Art of Writing
Persecution and the Art of Writing That’s the catchy title of a book published in the 1950’s by a man named Leo Strauss – initially derided, later enormously influential. Outside philosophy and political theory, Strauss’s name is not generally … Continue reading →
Posted in Action, Art, Art of Living, books, Contradictions, Courtship, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Feminism, history of ideas, Literature, Love, Philosophy, Political, politics, politics of ideas, public facade, Public Intellectual, Reading, relationships, Roles, Romantic Love, social construction, Social Conventions, status, status of women, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged candor, candor in courtship, conspiracy theory, coquetry, courtship, dialectic, diplomacy, emigre philosophers, emigres, esotericism, Eugenics, exoteric writing, gauging the audience, hidden doctrine, hidden views, history of ideas, integrity, intellectual integrity, intellectuals, Leo Strauss’s Persecution and the Art of Writing, oral teaching, Palestinian student, people pleasing, philosophic training, philosophy, Plato's Phaedrus, Plato's Republic, political realism, political science, political theory, public intellectuals, rhetoric, saying the right thing, secret doctrine, social blunders, social intelligence, speech and silence, state managed reproduction, straight shooting, tact, the ideal state, The Woman Question, Thought Crimes, trial and error, truth-seekers, women in philosophy, writing in code
|
2 Comments
The Quakers: Another Round
The Quakers: Another Round Last week we met again with the small group of Quakers that’s been holding anti-Israel placards in the town square once a week all year. This is the third such meeting. I’m thinking, if you want … Continue reading →
Posted in "Absolute Freedom and Terror", Absurdism, Academe, Action, Alienation, Autonomy, Cities, Class, Contradictions, Cool, Courtship, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, Faith, Fashion, Femininity, Freedom, Friendship, Guilt and Innocence, History, history of ideas, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Institutional Power, Jews, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Male Power, master, Memoir, non-violence, Peace, Philosophy, Political, Political Movements, Power, Psychology, Race, Reductionism, relationships, Roles, Seduction, Sex Appeal, slave, Social Conventions, Spirituality, Suffering, Terror, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, Theism, Time, twentieth century, Violence, War, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged American Friends Service Committee, anti-Israel, anti-semitism, biblical right, bigotry, Christian era, conflict resolution, current conflict, demonic, demons, dialogue, enabling, Enlightenment, Eugenics, European Union, feelings, folk genius, gentility, graffiti, group therapy, historical rights, human rights, Israel, Israel's legitimacy, Jews, legal rights, limited palette, lobbying, longest hatred, moral rights, moral space, multiculturalism, negotiation, one-sidedness, particularism, placards, population displacement, post-Holocaust, post-Nazi, Quakers, race purification, racism, refugees, religious rights, Romanticism, rootlessness, Social Darwinism, spiritual right, Stockholm syndrome, street demonstration, tough love, tribalism, United Nations, universalism, vandalism, vigil, vigilantes, well-intentioned
|
4 Comments