Tag Archives: rhetoric
Persecution and the Art of Writing
Persecution and the Art of Writing That’s the catchy title of a book published in the 1950’s by a man named Leo Strauss – initially derided, later enormously influential. Outside philosophy and political theory, Strauss’s name is not generally … Continue reading →
Posted in action, art, art of living, books, contradictions, courtship, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, feminism, history of ideas, literature, love, philosophy, political, politics, politics of ideas, public facade, public intellectual, reading, relationships, roles, romantic love, social construction, social conventions, status, status of women, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, twentieth century, twenty-first century, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged candor, candor in courtship, conspiracy theory, coquetry, courtship, dialectic, diplomacy, emigre philosophers, emigres, esotericism, Eugenics, exoteric writing, gauging the audience, hidden doctrine, hidden views, history of ideas, integrity, intellectual integrity, intellectuals, Leo Strauss’s Persecution and the Art of Writing, oral teaching, Palestinian student, people pleasing, philosophic training, philosophy, Plato's Phaedrus, Plato's Republic, political realism, political science, political theory, public intellectuals, rhetoric, saying the right thing, secret doctrine, social blunders, social intelligence, speech and silence, state managed reproduction, straight shooting, tact, the ideal state, The Woman Question, Thought Crimes, trial and error, truth-seekers, women in philosophy, writing in code
|
2 Comments
“The Real World”
“The Real World” Is there a real world? There are those who deny it, and they are not the smallest fry in the ranks of the influential. I’ve been reading a new book called Winning Arguments by Stanley Fish, a … Continue reading →
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, evil, existentialism, faith, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, journalism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, male power, masculinity, master, memoir, memory, mind control, modernism, mortality, non-violence, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, philosophy, political, political movements, politics, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, reductionism, relationships, roles, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, social climbing, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, status, status of women, suffering, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, theology, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged Abigail L. Rosenthal's "Confessions of a Young Philosopher", argument, bad arguments, candor, coherence theory, Confessions of a Young Philosopher, contradiction, correspondence theory, doxa, dying, eloquence, embarrasment, epistemolgy, external world, facing death, fallacy, George Orwell, George Orwell's "1984", group consensus, honesty, inconsistency, influence, informal fallacies, informal logic, irrelevancy, language, last days, linguistic construction of reality, literary theory, losers, martial arts, Mind Control, modesty, noesis, non sequitur, norms, opinions, Orwell's "Animal Farm", Orwell's "Politics and the English Language" 1946, paradigm, Persuasion, persuasive power, picturing, post modernism, Power, pragmatic theory, real world, relevancy, rhetoric, silence, simplicity, Socrates, Sophistry, Stanley Fish, Stanley Fish's "Winning Arguments: What Works and Doesn't Work in Politics the Bedroom the Courtroom and the Classroom", terminal cancer, the God's eye view, The Gorgias, theories of truth, truth, TV debates, understanding, view from nowhere, visualizing, winners, winners and losers, winning and losing, wordsmith, world views
|
Leave a comment