Tag Archives: women’s rights
Is There Still Any “Woman Question”?
In recent years, Jerry has been urging me to write something about women. This because, in his observation, I genuinely like – even love – women! He thinks this a credential for writing on the topic, since a lot of … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, agnosticism, alienation, American politics, anthropology, anti-semitism, appreciation, art, art of living, atheism, authenticity, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Bible, Biblical Archeology, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, bureaucracy, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, Desire and Authenticity, dialectic, eighteenth century, erotic life, eternity, ethics, ethnicity, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, fatherhood, female power, femininity, feminism, filial piety, films, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jesus, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, Married Philosophers Discuss Confessions, martyrdom, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, medieval, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, motherhood, mysticism, Nihilism, nineteenth-century, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, power games, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, racism, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, remembrance, Renaissance, repairing the culture, roles, romance, romantic love, romanticism, science, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, slave, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, Truth, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged 19th century feminism, 19th century women, anti-models of womanhood, art of being a woman, Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, culture erasing womanhood, culture that erases womanhood, cynicism about femininity, cynicism about women, dangers common to women, de Beauvoir’s novels, de Beauvoir’s short stories, Debra Soh’s The End of Gender, disliking women, erasing femininity, femininity and cancel culture, femininity as a skill, Feminism, feminist history, first-wave feminism, Freud and women, Freud’s question about women, Freud’s What Do Women Want?, Joan Didion, Joan Didion’s The White Album, Judith Butler, Judith Butler’s feminism, learning to be a woman, loving women, Margaret Atwood’s Cat’s Eye, Margaret Atwood’s The Book of Lives: A Memoir of Sorts, Miriam Schneir’s Feminism in Our Time, misleading woman question, philosophy and feminism, philosophy and the woman question, second-wave feminism, Simone de Beauvoir, Stephanie Coontz’s Marriage: A History, success as a woman, successful womanhood, Sylvia Plath, Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar, teaching femininity, the feminine art, The Woman Question, the womanly art, the womanly art and cultural power, the womanly art in culture, what does woman want, women and bitterness, women and cancel culture, women and chastity, women and conformity, women and contraception, women and cynicism, women and guilt, women and innocence, women and justice, women and legal power, women and property, women and social risk, women as enemies of women, women as real-life models, women in abstract theories, women in real life, women in theories, women novelists, women protecting women, women who model womanhood, women writers, women’s biology-based vulnerabilities, women’s defenses, women’s history, women’s history-based vulnerabilities, women’s inheritance rights, women’s political concerns, women’s right to vote, women’s rights, women’s self-defense, women’s self-protective concerns, women’s vulnerabilities
|
2 Comments
Abortion on My Mind
Abortion on My Mind First, let’s approach this vexing topic from the metaphysical side. If we adopt the Aristotelian view of gestation (a view that, if I’m correct, was part of the thinking of Christian philosophers in the High … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, Biblical God, bigotry, books, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, courage, courtship, cultural politics, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, male power, master/slave relation, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, motherhood, ontology, oppression, past and future, philosophy, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romance, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, victimhood, victims, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged Abigail L Rosenthal’s Feminism Without Contradictions, Aristotelian view, asymmetry of the sexes, Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Prey: Immigration, biology and feminism, biology and rights, biology and social constructs, chivalry and the Titanic’s sinking, Islam and the Erosion of Women’s Rights, male protectiveness, men as the enemy, metaphysics and social questions, metaphysics and the unborn, mother’s body, Phyllis Chesler’s An American Bride in Kabul, potentiality to actuality, right to choose, right to life, rights of the unborn, Roe v Wade, Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, sisterhood is powerful, social coarsening, status of the unborn, status of zygote, Terri Shiavo, unsisterly women, when is it a person, when soul enters body, women and children first, women in Iran, women’s rights, women’s social power, women’s standing, women’s suffrage, women’s vulnerability
|
3 Comments
