Tag Archives: render unto Caesar
Does God Play Favorites?
Does God Play Favorites? I don’t enjoy competition. By that, I’m not intending to reject anyone’s marketplace of skills or services. It’s just my sincere personal confession. For example, I was a natural athlete as a child. But later, … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Bible, Biblical God, bigotry, books, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, medieval, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, mysticism, non-violence, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, philosophy, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romance, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Uncategorized, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged 70 C.E., accepting The Covenant, accommodating to Roman occupation, anti-semitism's historical roots, Chabad center, chess as war, choosing a bride, chosen land, Christian quietism, chronology of the Gospels, competition, cosmic comeback, curing anti-semitism, demonization of Jews, Divine favoritism, doing first then hearing The Covenant, Elaine Pagel's The Gnostic Gospels, Elaine Pagel's The Origin of Satan: How Christians Demonized Jews Pagans and Heretics, Essenes, fair competition, fall of Second Temple, Gentile redemption, God's election, God's romance, Israel as God's treasure, Jacob Taubes, Jewish rebellion, Jewish uprising against Rome, Jewish/Christian competition, Krister Stendahl, marketplace, natural athlete, non-competitive fun, Pharisees and Rome, playing favorites, politics of religion, Providential misunderstandings, psychic card playing, render unto Caesar, rodeo competition, Roman repression, romancing God, Rome and Jewish opinions, second coming, The Covenant and the nations, thumb on the scales, why the Jews, winners v losers, winning and losing, world historical mistake
|
3 Comments
Jesus
Jesus This morning we had one of those leisurely breakfasts that goes on for some hours. The pleasure of being two philosophers who love each other comes into its own at such times. There are philosopher couples who indulge in … Continue reading →
Posted in action, afterlife, anthropology, art of living, atheism, Bible, Biblical God, Christianity, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, courage, cultural politics, culture, desire, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, exploitation, faith, fashion, freedom, friendship, guilt and innocence, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, mortality, mysticism, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, race, radicalism, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romantic love, secular, self-deception, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, suffering, terror, terrorism, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged 70 C.E., accepting Jesus, Bar Kochba, bar mitzvah, breakfast talk, Christendom, Christian converts, Christian theology, defeating Rome, Delilah, Divine Presence, divine/human union, false messiahs, fighting Rome, Gentile "Friends of God", God's love, God's will, Goliath, houses of worship, human damnation, Jerry L. Martin's "God: an Autobiography as Told to a Philosopher", Jesus, Jesus the Jew, Jesus the Jewish Messiah, Jesus the Messiah, Jesus the savior, Jewish congregants, Jewish doctrines, Jewish exile, Jewish/Christian competition, Jews and Jesus, Jews for Jesus, King David, losing the argument, losing the truth, mediation of Jesus, meeting Jesus, Muslim hegemony, original sin, Paul's doctrines, philosopher couples, philosophers in love, philosophical argument, philosophical competetiveness, politics of religion, render unto Caesar, scoring points, self love, self-blame, self-contempt, Shekinah, Socrates, synagogues, talking philosophy, talking to Jesus, Temple Judea, the best religion, The Crucifixion, the Kingdom of God, the Philistines, the Second Temple, winning the argument, winning the truth, zealots
|
2 Comments