Tag Archives: Reader I married him
It’s Our Twentieth!
It’s Our Twentieth! January 20th, 2020, is our twentieth anniversary and, over the past few days, we’ve been talking about what it all means. In our first year, when I still lived in New York and Jerry in Washington D.C., … Continue reading
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, Bible, Biblical God, books, bureaucracy, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, masculinity, master, medieval, memoir, memory, mind control, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, mysticism, nineteenth-century, novels, ontology, oppression, past and future, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romance, romantic love, romanticism, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, work, writing, Zeitgeist
Tagged a fish without a bicycle, a woman without a man, Abraham and Sarah, biblical flawed people, biblical models, Biblical narrative, biblical prototypes, biblical romance, Charlotte Bronte, collegial advisors, commuting marriage, consulting experts, delusions, girlhood daydreams, gnostic lovers, grave of Heloise and Abelard, Heloise and Abelard, identity markers, institutional role, Isaac and Rebecca, it’s a miracle, Jacob and Rachel, joint life, letting be, life together, love and work, love as knowledge, madness of love, medieval troubadours, mutual support, neutral vantage point, new beginnings, partnership, Père Lachaise Cemetery, Reader I married him, reciprocity, requirements of marriage, reshaping one’s life, risking identity, romantic feeling, sanity markers, shared space, shared time, social dignity, social status, story of God and humankind, taking a chance, teamwork, the bachelor life, the good fight, the rose clings ‘round the briar, Tristan and Iseult, view from nowhere, wedding anniversary, winning know how, with love all things are possible
2 Comments