Tag Archives: idealization of women
Boys, Girls, and Metaphysical Monism
By “metaphysical monism” I mean the view that every kind of variety and difference in the world is ultimately unreal. So what’s real? The One. In reality, the many things we experience are One Thing or – more precisely – … Continue reading →
Posted in Absurdism, Academe, Action, Afterlife, Alienation, Anthropology, Art, Art of Living, Atheism, Autonomy, bad faith, beauty, books, Chivalry, Cities, Class, conformism, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, Courtship, cults, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Eternity, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, exploitation, Faith, Fashion, Female Power, Femininity, Feminism, Films, Freedom, Friendship, Gender Balance, Gnosticism, Guilt and Innocence, Health, hegemony, Heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history of ideas, ID, idealism, Ideality, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Immorality, Immortality, Institutional Power, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Male Power, Martyrdom, Masculinity, master, master/slave relation, memory, Mind Control, Modern Women, Modernism, Moral action, Moral evaluation, Moral psychology, morality, Mortality, Mysticism, non-violence, Ontology, Oppression, pacifism, Past and Future, Peace, Philosophy, Poetry, Political Movements, politics of ideas, post modernism, Power, presence, promissory notes, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Reading, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, Romantic Love, science, scientism, secular, Seduction, self-deception, Sex Appeal, Sexuality, social climbing, social construction, Social Conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, Spirituality, status, status of women, Suffering, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, the profane, the sacred, Theism, Theology, Time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged above the battle, achieving samadhi, Achilles and the Hare, appearance and reality, ashram attractions, bad guys shouldn’t win, beyond good and evil, change as delusive, clever enemies, corruption in ashrams, credible defamations, damaging fictions, delusion of difference, difference as unreal, fall of the guru, feminine power, feminine vulnerability, finding refuge in a different culture, Gnosticism, Gnosticism in Western culture, human condition as fallen, idealization of women, malicious gossip, metaphysical idealism, metaphysical monism, metaphysical monism and human rights, new age and brainwashing, ordinary common sense, Parmenides, Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras, personal defeat of the guru, realized masters, refuge in ashram, spiritual dangers, stopping bad guys, the one as sole reality, women's vulnerability, yoga and abuse of power, yoga and ethical abuses, yoga and human rights, yoga and sex asymmetries, yoga and the guru, yoga as protection, yoga for health, yoga sex differences, yoga siddhis, Zeno, Zeno’s paradoxes
|
Leave a comment
“Rudeness”
“Rudeness” A few years ago I was riding from terminal to terminal on an airport bus in Texas. By the time I climbed on board, the bus had standing room only. I was hanging on a strap, keeping my hand … Continue reading →
Posted in Absurdism, Academe, Action, Anthropology, Art of Living, beauty, Chivalry, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, Courtship, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Ethics, Evil, Faith, Fashion, Femininity, Feminism, Freedom, Friendship, Gender Balance, Guilt and Innocence, Health, hegemony, Heroes, History, history of ideas, Idealism, Ideality, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Immorality, Institutional Power, Jews, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Love, Male Power, Masculinity, master, memory, Mind Control, Mortality, non-violence, Oppression, Past and Future, Peace, Philosophy, Political, Political Movements, politics, Power, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Public Intellectual, Reductionism, relationships, Roles, Romance, Seduction, self-deception, Sex Appeal, Sexuality, slave, Social Conventions, Sociobiology, Suffering, Terror, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, Time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, Violence, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged academic dinner parties, action theory, ad hominem argument, Aristotle, Aristotle’s Ethics, Australian philosophical life, baiting, belief systems, Bullying, Cambridge University, chivalry, civil life, collegial relations, collegiality, conviviality, courtesy, desperate straits, dinner parties, effrontery, faculty wives, false consciousness, frustrated chivalry, gallantry, gentlemen, governing charters, hegemony, Hobbes’s Leviathan, human history, idealization of men, idealization of women, impertinence, incivility, ingratitude, insults, Jew-baiting, kid stuff, ladies, ladies first, launching a movement, life and death struggle, macro-history, Male Power, male supremacy, manners, manners and rules, masked insults, membership dues, membership roster, minority group, minority status, name-calling, new political movement, number one, obscenity, Oppression, oppressive system, ostracism, outspokenness, patriarchy, Peterhouse, philosophers from Peterhouse, philosophical abstractions, Political Movements, politics of the future, power smiles, powerlessness, precision in action, pretense, privacy, private sensibilities, rape, rape threat, rule of law, rule of the stronger, rules, sensitivity, ship christening, social complexity, social courage, social dilemmas, social empowerment, social ordeals, social patterns, social reciprocity, social reprisals, state of nature, Texans, the Other, the right act, toothy smiles, tyranny of the majority, U.K., unfair advantage, virtues, vulgarity, war of all against all, women & children first
|
Leave a comment