Tag Archives: ad hominem argument
My Body in the Culture Wars
Hegel would say that culture wars occur where there are opposing claims to define the culture – have the final say, the last word – decide what determines “the absolute” for that culture. Depending on where you find yourself on such … Continue reading →
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Biblical God, bigotry, books, bureaucracy, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, Idealism-, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, institutional power, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, martyrdom, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, non-violence, novels, ontology, oppression, pacifism, past and future, peace, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, political, political movements, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, racism, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romantic love, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, slave, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, violence, war, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged acing a test, ad hominem argument, animal intuitions, arguing with a narcissist, attracting predators, best lack all conviction, betraying one's calling, betraying trust, body language of confusion, body language of predators, body language of victims, breaking norms to disarm others, categorizing victims, choice between wrong answers, Columbia College Core, Columbia College Core Curriculum, Columbia University, confronting a mob, conscience and crime, crime and public interest, crime and publicity, culture wars, debating Trump, defending against a swarm, defining the culture, disarming a hostile crowd, don't apologize, escaping a mob, evil and denial, fallacy in argument, fight or flight, Freeze response, go along to get along, Grad Record Exams, Hegel, ideals of yoga, insult in debate, inviting predators, Jennie Lightweis-Goff's Vulnerability in America, Liberal Arts, mob mentality, moral explanation, morally painful and mentally easy, multiple choice of wrong answers, nonverbal combats, North Korean classrooms, nothing is sacred, phenomenology of depravity, pretend neutrality, pretense of neutrality, rating crime by demographic category, rating crimes as drawing viewers, ridicule in debate, signaling defeat, signaling victory, SIX HIRB, smelling danger, sociological explanation, sociological vs moral explanation, subjectivity and objectivity, taunting in debate, teachers of propaganda, Ten Commandments, the Absolute in culture, the absolute in Hegel, the body in social space, the case for common sense, thou shalt not kill, tyranny and propaganda, unfair accusation and apologies, verbal combats, visibly fearless, vulnerability of women, W. B. Yeats, woke at Columbia University, woke in academe, women and objectivity, women's disadvantage in debate, words can be powerless, worst full of passionate intensity, Yeonmi Park's In Order to Live: A North Korean Girl's Journey to Freedom, Yeonmi Park's While Time Remains: a North Korean Defector's Search for Freedom in America
|
Leave a comment
“Rudeness”
“Rudeness” A few years ago I was riding from terminal to terminal on an airport bus in Texas. By the time I climbed on board, the bus had standing room only. I was hanging on a strap, keeping my hand … Continue reading →
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, anthropology, art of living, beauty, chivalry, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, evil, faith, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, heroes, history, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, institutional power, Jews, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, love, male power, masculinity, master, memory, mind control, mortality, non-violence, oppression, past and future, peace, philosophy, political, political movements, politics, power, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, reductionism, relationships, roles, romance, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, slave, social conventions, sociobiology, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, violence, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged academic dinner parties, action theory, ad hominem argument, Aristotle, Aristotle’s Ethics, Australian philosophical life, baiting, belief systems, Bullying, Cambridge University, chivalry, civil life, collegial relations, collegiality, conviviality, courtesy, desperate straits, dinner parties, effrontery, faculty wives, false consciousness, frustrated chivalry, gallantry, gentlemen, governing charters, hegemony, Hobbes’s Leviathan, human history, idealization of men, idealization of women, impertinence, incivility, ingratitude, insults, Jew-baiting, kid stuff, ladies, ladies first, launching a movement, life and death struggle, macro-history, Male Power, male supremacy, manners, manners and rules, masked insults, membership dues, membership roster, minority group, minority status, name-calling, new political movement, number one, obscenity, Oppression, oppressive system, ostracism, outspokenness, patriarchy, Peterhouse, philosophers from Peterhouse, philosophical abstractions, Political Movements, politics of the future, power smiles, powerlessness, precision in action, pretense, privacy, private sensibilities, rape, rape threat, rule of law, rule of the stronger, rules, sensitivity, ship christening, social complexity, social courage, social dilemmas, social empowerment, social ordeals, social patterns, social reciprocity, social reprisals, state of nature, Texans, the Other, the right act, toothy smiles, tyranny of the majority, U.K., unfair advantage, virtues, vulgarity, war of all against all, women & children first
|
Leave a comment