Tag Archives: Rudyard Kipling’s The Widow at Windsor
How to Be Modern
How to Be Modern I’ve never understood why people wanted to be modern in the first place. Okay, the dentistry is an improvement. I’ll give you that. On the other hand, Victorian people (as in the novels of Dickens) seemed … Continue reading
Posted in Absolute Freedom and Terror, absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, beauty, Biblical God, books, bureaucracy, childhood, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, courtship, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, feminism, films, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, immortality, institutional power, Jews, journalism, Judaism, law, life and death struggle, literature, love, male power, masculinity, master, memoir, memory, Messianic Age, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, motherhood, mysticism, nineteenth-century, novels, ontology, oppression, Phenomenology of the Mind, philosophy, poetry, political movements, politics, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, radicalism, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, romance, romantic love, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sex appeal, sexuality, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, work, writing, Zeitgeist
Tagged 1920s modernity, 19th-century Manhattan, Anglo-American Philosophy, anti-establishment, anti-Victorian people, antinomian, Astor buildings, atomic facts, atomic propositions, behaviorism, being modern, cityscapes, contemporary dentistry, Continental philosophy, defining modernity, Dickensian people, ego-driven architecture, epiphenomenon, excluding the mental, Freud’s falsifiability, Freudian psychoanalysis, go along to get along, Hoop skirts, John Brown Queen Victoria’s attendant, Karl Marx, life after death, logical atomism, logical positivism, logicism, Marx’s falsifiability, mind/body problem, modern architecture, mother knows best, philosophical skepticism, Prince Albert, psychic medium, psychology as put down, quantifiable things, Queen Victoria, reductionism in psychology, refutation of positivism, reinventing philosophy, Rudyard Kipling’s The Widow at Windsor, secular religions, Sigmund Freud, skepticism’s contradictions, smothering mother, supervenience, the age of Victoria, unconscious motivation, Victor Zammit’s Friday Afterlife Report, Victoria recorded, Victorian people
Leave a comment