Tag Archives: “Philosophic Foundations of Feminism”
It’s August and My Shrink is in the Hamptons!
It’s August and My Shrink is in the Hamptons! There was a time in Manhattan when virtually everyone I knew was in Freud-based therapy. So people would have trouble getting through August, because that was when their shrinks were vacationing … Continue reading
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, alienation, American politics, anthropology, art, art of living, atheism, autonomy, books, bureaucracy, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, cults, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, guilt and innocence, health, hegemony, hierarchy, history, history of ideas, id, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, institutional power, legal responsibility, life and death struggle, literature, male power, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, memory, mind control, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, nineteenth-century, oppression, past and future, philosophy, poetry, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, promissory notes, propaganda, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, reading, reductionism, relationships, roles, scientism, secular, seduction, self-deception, sexuality, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, sociobiology, spiritual journey, status, status of women, suffering, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, time, twentieth century, victimhood, victims, work, writing, Zeitgeist
Tagged "Philosophic Foundations of Feminism", August in Manhattan, bad arguments, counterculture, do your own thing, Dora and Freud, Edward Erwin, Freud and women, Freud-based therapy, Freud’s “Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria”, Freud’s case studies, Freud’s life, Freudian diagnosis, hysteria, life validation, Manhattan, nonjudgmental, Norman Lebrecht’s “Genius and Anxiety: How Jews Changed the World 1847-1947”, philosophical assumptions, philosophy at Stony Brook, poetic verdict, psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic cures, quack cures, quackery, SUNY at Stony Brook, the “Wolf Man”, the Hamptons
2 Comments
“Peer Pressure”
“Peer Pressure” No one can resist peer pressure. Such is the judgment of Peter Berger, sociologist of knowledge. To this generalization, I am no exception. For that reason perhaps, peer pressure interests me. One time, I entered the lobby of … Continue reading
Posted in academe, action, alienation, cool, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, ethics, fashion, femininity, feminism, freedom, gender balance, Hegel, history of ideas, ideology, institutional power, male power, masculinity, master, memoir, philosophy, political, political movements, power, psychology, relationships, roles, sexuality, social conventions, sociobiology, suffering, the examined life, the problematic of woman
Tagged "Feminism Without Contradictions", "Philosophic Foundations of Feminism", "The Enfranchisement of Women", "The Subjection of Women", academic feminism, American Philosophical Association, argumentative power, cutting edge, feminists, Gender, good old boys, groupthink, hair style, Harriet Taylor Mill, identity, John Stuart Mill, nineteenth-century philosophy, peer pressure, Peter Berger, professional meetings, role models, sex, sex roles, social pressure, sociology of knowledge, The Monist, the social construction of reality, Women's Studies
Leave a comment
