Tag Archives: styles of normality
If Our Time Could Speak
If Our Time Could Speak In recent columns, I’ve mentioned that for me The Plague has opened the time to read through the journals, correspondence and manuscripts, published and unpublished, of my late father, Henry M. Rosenthal, who was considered, … Continue reading →
Posted in Absurdism, Academe, Action, Afterlife, Alienation, American Politics, Anthropology, Art, Art of Living, Atheism, Autonomy, beauty, Biblical God, books, Childhood, Chivalry, Christianity, Cities, Class, conformism, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Eternity, Ethics, Existentialism, exploitation, Faith, Fashion, Femininity, Feminism, Films, Freedom, Friendship, Gender Balance, glitterati, Guilt and Innocence, Health, Hegel, hegemony, Heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, History, history of ideas, ID, Idealism, Ideality, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Immortality, Institutional Power, Jews, Judaism, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Male Power, Masculinity, Memoir, memory, Modernism, Moral action, Moral evaluation, Moral psychology, morality, Mortality, nineteenth-century, Ontology, Oppression, Past and Future, Peace, Phenomenology of Mind, Philosophy, Poetry, politics of ideas, post modernism, Power, presence, promissory notes, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Public Intellectual, Race, radicalism, Reading, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, Romantic Love, scientism, secular, Seduction, self-deception, Sex Appeal, social climbing, social construction, Social Conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, Spirituality, status, status of women, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, the profane, the sacred, Theism, Theology, Time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged 19th-century seriousness, 19th-century styles, A.E. Housman’s “With Rue My Heart is Laden”, addressing the future, ancient Rome, Archimedes, Authenticity, authenticity in the future, authenticity today, Being oneself, character-defining opinions, class genius, Columbia class of 1925, common peril, Covid-19 preventives, Covid-19 treatments, cultural boundary conditions, cultural limits, cultural parameters, deconstructionism, destabiliizing concepts, dissolving ethnic boundaries, dissolving historic boundaries, ethnic identity, father-daughter relation, filial piety, global cooperation, global research, group solidarity, group think, habit makes the monk, Henry M. Rosenthal, Henry M. Rosenthal's "Time Speaking" 1945, imitating a statue, imitating an emperor, imperial pose, inherited differences, international antiviral research, lever principle, liberating lightness, lighten up, lightfoot lads and lasses, lightness of today, literary legacy, men in the 1940s, mental roller coaster, mores of the era, normality, pagan science, paganism, pan-human research, people of the future, place to stand, portraying one’s era, pre-feminist women, professed lightness, re-valuating values, religious identity, Roman emperor, Roman statue, saying what you mean, social construct, socially bestowed credentials, speaking from the future, speaking from the past, spirit of the time, standing one’s ground, statuesque pose, striking a pose, style of lightness, styles of normality, styles of the 1940s, styles of today, The Plague, unprecedented common effort, unpublished manuscript, vanished landmarks, women in the 1940s
|
Leave a comment