“Evil is Really Not Banal”

“Evil is Really Not Banal”

This past week we’ve been in California, where I’ve resumed my treatments for neuropathy at the Loma Linda hospital.  The other event of the week, salient for me, was a talk at the Claremont School of Theology with the title,

“Evil Is Not Banal.”

There are two younger theologians who normally organize these events.  As it happened, one was on leave.  The other was home recovering from minor eye surgery and simultaneously tending to a gas leak.

Counting Jerry,

We had a total of five in the audience.

Was I rattled?  Well no.  I was focused on the business of the afternoon, which was explaining what evil is and is not.  But of course I did notice.

There’s a back story to my noticing.  From the moment of its appearance in February 2018, A Good Look at Evil has encountered an astonishing array of obstacles.  For example: it was published with the wrong pub date; the earlier edition was posted on Amazon in place of the expanded new edition; at one time the earlier preface was placed in the new edition instead of the new preface; customer reviews of the new edition were placed next to the earlier edition, and – there’s more, but I hope you get the idea.  Of course, all this while I was coping with a fractured knee.

Despite all of that, from the start the book has drawn attentive, serious and extremely favorable endorsements and reviews from highly regarded people you can’t buy for love or money.

But the feature of its publication that’s been noticed by me was the appearance of a character in my real life who paralleled the character of The Seducer portrayed in my book in the section called “The Rake’s Progress”!

Was this a coincidence?  After all, real life is filled with coincidences — events that seem to have a meaning but are merely the effect of chance.

But on the other hand: if we were to take the imaginative leap of picturing “evil” as a person, having personal intentions, wouldn’t such a person do his or her damnedest to test the ability of a writer to fight the real thing in a real-life setting, rather than just combat it with words on paper?  Was “evil” trying to find out if I really meant what I wrote?

Of course I don’t know … but I couldn’t help noticing.

Anyway, back to my talk at Claremont.  To my relief, I experienced no inward qualms about reading my paper to a small but – as it turned out – highly focused and intelligent group.

The aim of my paper was to show that it took conscious evil to bring about the Holocaust.  The perpetrators of the Holocaust were not mere bureaucrats acting by rote.  Hannah Arendt, who popularized this fiction, had been complicit in a kind of moral cover-up for reasons of her own.  Her reasons have come to light in the years since her vastly influential book, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, was first published. When, from time to time, I stopped reading and gave illustrations from real life, the audience seemed to “get it.”  So, no problem.

Time for Q & A.  There were several intelligent and responsive questions – prompts for further thought about these hard topics.

Then a quiet, decorous gentleman, who had a certain modest but elegant bearing, raised his hand.  It was not to ask a question.  It was to explain, “objectively,” as he said, that Jews had brought the Holocaust on themselves.

How did they do that?  He had a list of about five points.  As it happens, I recognized his points.  In researching A Good Look at Evil, I had read Nazi materials and was familiar with the language and its claims to “objectivity.”

Nevertheless, to hear it in an academic Q & A was a new experience for me.  I’d read about this stuff.  I’d never actually met it shorn of its usual disguises.  I looked at Jerry, seated in the front row.  He was, as he told me later, wondering what I would say. I was wondering too.

Looking upward, the guidance I got was unequivocal. What I said, following it, was this:






Despite a few further attempts from the decorous gentleman to reassert his views and his topics, the Q & A got firmly removed from that terrain.  The remainder of the discussion was fruitful and interesting.

So what was happening here?  If “evil” – pictured by imaginative leap as a person — wanted to entrap me in its coils, how better to entice an academic than to draw her into hopeless counter-argument with someone who came to her talk for the sole purpose of excusing the Holocaust with a mindset lethally immune to argument?

This whole sequence of “coincidental” happenings has had the odd effect of firming my resolve with regard to A Good Look at Evil.  The life I prefer is quiet, recessive and harmonious.  I don’t relish a fight.  But if it has my name on it …

well, that’s different.

About Abigail

Abigail Rosenthal is Professor Emerita of Philosophy, Brooklyn College of CUNY. She is the author of A Good Look at Evil, a Pulitzer Prize nominee, now available in an expanded, revised second edition and as an audiobook. Its thesis is that good people try to live out their stories while evil people aim to mess up good people’s stories. Her next book, Confessions of a Young Philosopher, forthcoming and illustrated, provides multiple illustrations from her own life. She writes a weekly column for her blog, “Dear Abbie: The Non-Advice Column” (www.dearabbie-nonadvice.com) where she explains why women's lives are highly interesting. She’s the editor of the posthumously published Consolations of Philosophy: Hobbes’s Secret; Spinoza’s Way by her father, Henry M. Rosenthal. Some of her articles can be accessed at https://brooklyn-cuny.academia.edu/AbigailMartin . She is married to Jerry L. Martin, also a philosopher. They live in Bucks County, Pennsylvania.
This entry was posted in "Absolute Freedom and Terror", Absurdism, Academe, Action, Alienation, American Politics, Art of Living, Atheism, Autonomy, Biblical God, books, bureaucracy, Christianity, Cities, Class, conformism, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, cults, Cultural Politics, Culture, dialectic, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, exploitation, Faith, Fashion, Femininity, Feminism, Freedom, Friendship, glitterati, Guilt and Innocence, Hegel, hegemony, Heroes, hidden God, History, history of ideas, Idealism, Ideality, Identity, Ideology, Idolatry, Immorality, Institutional Power, Jews, Journalism, Judaism, Law, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Martyrdom, Memoir, memory, Mind Control, Modernism, Moral action, Moral evaluation, Moral psychology, morality, Mortality, Oppression, Past and Future, Peace, Philosophy, Political, Political Movements, politics, politics of ideas, post modernism, Power, presence, promissory notes, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Public Intellectual, Race, radicalism, Reading, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, secular, Seduction, self-deception, social construction, Social Conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, Spirituality, status, status of women, Suffering, Terror, terrorism, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, the profane, the sacred, Theism, Theology, Time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, victimhood, victims, Violence, War, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to “Evil is Really Not Banal”

  1. Pingback: The Return of the Well-Tailored Proto-Nazi | "Dear Abbie: The Non-Advice Column"

  2. Timothy Haverkamp says:

    John Lukacs in The Duel states that Hitler was able to channel a new, original, and potent energy in the form of nationalism that animated and imbued the German people with a deep, almost mythical power to forcefully enact his vision. This would seem to be quite the opposite of banality. Lukacs also cautions us to not write Hitler off as a mad man or to consider the Nazi “experiment” as a mere blip in history. We can see appeals to xenophobia and authoritarianism in our current administration. Hopefully, we can all speak the truth when confronted with evil in our own personal lives as you were able to do. Glad to know there is a counterweight to the voices of people like Candace Owens, Stephen Miller, Richard Spencer et al. It is wishful thinking to hope that what Hitler unleashed in WWII died with him. We will have to stay ever vigilant and pray for a double portion of strength as we navigate this long night…

  3. castaway5555 says:

    I was there … to hear something of great interest to me, and I was well-rewarded … excellent lecture by a gifted scholar/writer … who offered the profound reply noted above to the “decorous” gentlemen. His input was the equivalent of fingernails on a chalkboard, and Dr. Rosenthal’s reply was firmly and forthrightly given … it felt like a pronouncement from on high, and it might well have been.

    • Abigail says:

      Tom, your presence in that hall was most appreciated. And it’s all the more heartening to see your corroboration of my report here in this forum. A gesture of timely spiritual friendship!

  4. Prudence Lezy says:

    So proud of you, Abigail! I’m so distressed with what is going on in Congress this week with the anti Semitic Muslim congresswoman and the Democratic leadership so far refusing to censure.

  5. Judy Dornstreich says:

    Dear Madame Academic: Jaw-dropping while reading “the real thing happening in a real life setting”. Good ”noticing”! Perhaps too distressing to hear the Divine Chuckle in the midst of the on-the-ground battle. Also, I applaud your ability to get back to the Q&A with the others after the decorous gentleman’s chllenge. My heart would have been bouncing around like a ping-pong ball, making the mind a useless mess.

    • Abigail says:

      Judy my dear. As you can imagine, I think I’ve never said anything remotely like that in my life. Frankly, I don’t believe those words were coming from me, if you know what I’m saying.

  6. Johan Herrenberg says:

    I find ‘blaming the victim’ in the case of the Holocaust monstrous. I commend your forceful reaction. What is going on inside these people’s heads to want to excuse Hitler and his many henchmen (and -women)?

Leave a Reply