Tag Archives: Charles Van Doren
Call No Woman Happy
In his Histories, Herodotus tells the tale of a certain King Croesus of Lydia (reigned 585-547 BCE) who boasted of his happiness to a guest, the wise Solon. The guest warned him that – given life’s uncertainties – no one … Continue reading
Posted in Absurdism, Academe, Action, Afterlife, Alienation, American Politics, Anthropology, Art, Art of Living, Atheism, Autonomy, bad faith, beauty, Biblical God, bigotry, book reviews, books, Childhood, Chivalry, Christianity, Cities, Class, conformism, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courage, cults, Cultural Politics, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Eternity, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, exploitation, Faith, Fashion, Freedom, Friendship, Gender Balance, glitterati, Gnosticism, Guilt and Innocence, Health, hegemony, Heroes, hidden God, hierarchy, History, history of ideas, ID, idealism, Ideality, Identity, Idolatry, Immorality, Immortality, Institutional Power, Journalism, Law, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Male Power, Masculinity, master, master/slave relation, Memoir, memory, Mind Control, Modernism, Moral action, Moral evaluation, Moral psychology, morality, Ontology, Oppression, Past and Future, Peace, Philosophy, Poetry, Political, politics of ideas, post modernism, Power, presence, promissory notes, Propaganda, Psychology, public facade, Public Intellectual, Reading, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, Romance, secular, Seduction, self-deception, Sex Appeal, Sexuality, social climbing, social construction, Social Conventions, social ranking, Sociobiology, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, Spirituality, status, status of women, Suffering, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, the profane, the sacred, Theism, Theology, Time, TV, twentieth century, twenty-first century, Utopia, victimhood, victims, Violence, Work, Writing, Zeitgeist
Tagged admitting that one is happy, anachronistic judgements, Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle’s view that the dead suffer from the living, beyond our control, call no man happy, call no man happy until he is dead, cancel culture, Charles Van Doren, Charles Van Doren’s congressional testimony, classical proverbs, Columbia College Class of 1925, congruence with one’s self, Cyrus and Croesus, dangers of success, death as refuge, destroyed reputation, don’t speak ill of the dead, dumb and happy, family honor, family in the public eye, family politcs, family prestige, fascism and antifacisim, father son relation, fear of success, feeling another’s sorrows, fortune is fickle, Founding Fathers, friendship and empathy, good breeding, good taste and bad form, happiness and envy, happiness in the real world, happiness mistaken for stupidity, Henry M Rosenthal, Herodotus’ Histories, heroes unmasked, highbrow reputation, hubris, ignorance is bliss, inward joy, joy and misfortune, joy vs happiness, judging the past by current standards, King Croesus, learning life's lessons, life’s contingencies, lifelong regrets, literary celebrity, loss of standing, luck and merit, mob mentality, moralism, nobody’s perfect, personal downfall, posthumous disgrace, posthumous loss of reputation, pride goeth before a fall, public approval, pulling moral rank, realistic happiness, repercussions, reputation reversal, retroactive moralistic denunciations, rich as Creosus, rolling with the punches, self integration, showbiz or dishonesty, showbiz vs integrity, social hierarchy, Solon and Croesus, students of Mark Van Doren, success and happiness, tempting fate, that’s showbiz, the ancients were right, The Autobiography of Mark Van Doren 1958, the etiquette of happiness, the hazards of joy, the integrated self, the past is present, the risks of happiness, TV celebrity, uncertainties of fate, uncovering secrets
2 Comments
“Happiness”
“Happiness” “Call no man happy until he is dead,” said Solon, the ancient sage, to Croesus. Croesus was “rich as Croesus,” as the saying goes, and king of Lydia. So he was nonplussed at Solon’s reluctance to admit that he … Continue reading
Posted in Absurdism, Academe, Action, Alienation, Autonomy, Class, Contemplation, Contradictions, Cool, Courtship, Culture, Desire, dialectic, Erotic Life, Ethics, Evil, Existentialism, Faith, Fashion, Femininity, Freedom, Friendship, Guilt and Innocence, Health, Heroes, History, history of ideas, Identity, Idolatry, Institutional Power, Legal Responsibility, life and death struggle, Literature, Love, Masculinity, Memoir, Philosophy, Poetry, Political, Power, Psychology, Public Intellectual, Reductionism, relationships, Religion, Roles, Seduction, Sex Appeal, Social Conventions, Sociobiology, Spirituality, Suffering, The Examined Life, The Problematic of Men, The Problematic of Woman, Theism, twentieth century, Writing, Zeitgeist
Tagged "Quiz Show", "the pursuit of happiness", academic fight, acupuncture, Advice, Ancient Lydia, Ancient Persia, anguish, Aristotle, bird baths, bird watching, birds, birthright, Brooklyn College, Carl Mangione PT, celebrity, Charles Van Doren, cheating, college curriculum, Columbia class of 1925, confession, Croesus, Cyrus the Great, Declaration of Independence, despair, divine gifts, family honor, grace, gratitude, hairdresser, handicap, Henry M. Rosenthal, human rights, identity, ingratitude, insincerity, Jennifer Kelly hairstylist, Kinetic syndrome, Mark Van Doren, memoir, misery, mortification, Mr. Right, national scandal, Nicomachean Ethics, non-advice, normality, physical therapy, problem of evil, reputation, resignation, Richard Firnhaber acupuncture, right to happiness, sell out, selling one's birthright, sincerity, Solon, suffering, the emotional norm, The History of Herodotus, the human norm, the mental norm, the physical norm, the psychical norm, TV idol, TV Quiz Show, unhappiness, walking handicap, wickedness
Leave a comment