Tag Archives: academic seminar
How I Got My Philosophic Theme
How I Got My Philosophic Theme As far as I can recall, it was a specific event, leading to a particular experience, that gave me the defining theme of the work I’ve done since then in philosophy. I’d gone uptown … Continue reading →
Posted in absurdism, academe, action, afterlife, alienation, American politics, art of living, atheism, autonomy, bad faith, Bible, Biblical God, bigotry, books, chivalry, Christianity, cities, class, conformism, contemplation, contradictions, cool, courage, cultural politics, culture, desire, dialectic, erotic life, eternity, ethics, evil, existentialism, exploitation, faith, fashion, female power, femininity, friendship, gender balance, glitterati, guilt and innocence, health, Hegel, hegemony, heroes, hidden God, history, history of ideas, idealism, ideality, identity, ideology, idolatry, immorality, institutional power, Jews, Judaism, law, life and death struggle, love, male power, masculinity, master, master/slave relation, memoir, memory, mind control, modern women, modernism, moral action, moral evaluation, moral psychology, morality, mortality, ontology, oppression, past and future, peace, philosophy, politics of ideas, postmodernism, power, presence, psychology, public facade, public intellectual, race, reading, reductionism, relationships, religion, roles, secular, seduction, self-deception, social climbing, social construction, social conventions, social ranking, spiritual journey, spiritual not religious, spirituality, status, status of women, suffering, terror, the examined life, the problematic of men, the problematic of woman, the profane, the sacred, theism, theology, time, twentieth century, twenty-first century, victimhood, violence, work, writing, Zeitgeist
|
Tagged Abigail L. Rosenthal's "A Good Look at Evil", academic politics, academic seminar, cat's away mice can play, collegial relations, Columbia University, don't bore God, family friend, getting God's attention, God as personal, God as Witness, good v evil plotline, hating God of Israel, human visibility to God, intellectual competition, Leo Bronstein, living a true story, loyalty to origins, metaphysical vision, naivete as armor, philosopher's motivating themes, philosophic argument, philosophic colleagues, philosophic counter-argument, philosophic experience, philosophic theme, pretended purity, social weaponry, struggle between good and evil, the life of argument, the religion of Israel, the test of dialectic, theological anti-semitism, unquestioned trust, vision on New York subway, what is a Jew?, What is an anti-semite?, writer's primary datum
|
Leave a comment