Years ago, Esquire magazine ran an article on the state of cancer research and treatment. It included this line: “When you’re playing against the Big Casino, the odds are with the House.”
I don’t know whether I thought particularly of that article when the diagnosis was rendered, but I did say to my friend and colleague Mary Wiseman as we stepped outside the doctor’s office, “I can’t do this.”
I was quite frankly terrified. First, cancer could kill me. Second, cancer would definitely put me into the power of doctors. I’m not sure which prospect was more alarming, but I didn’t trust Death and I didn’t trust Doctors. Not when they can put you under, cut the wrong thing, and have at you with all their savage reductionism. Something causes cancer. I didn’t know what the cause was, or the cure, but I didn’t think it would be what they’d say it was.
There was another feature that terrified me even more than death and doctors. In the year leading up to that medical diagnosis, I’d found myself the target of accusations that were false, defamatory and – because the source should have been trustworthy – believed by people who had been important social supports in my life. As that isolating drama ripened, I was well aware that there could be a medical price to pay. And now, cancer? Just what I feared? The predictability terrified me. My work was not done, my life aims not achieved.
When I woke the next morning, there was no hiding place. I sat for meditation, sobbing and pointing out to God how badly He’d bungled my life. Finally, too tired to go on, I subsided. In the silence, I felt the presence of our late family friend Léo Bronstein, of whom I’ve written here in several previous posts. “Guggy,” Léo said to me, using the name he’d bestowed when I was little, “stop making speeches and listen to orders!”
I quieted down then, to await the deliverances of meditation. What I was shown next was a kind of life review, slide by slide. There were my intentional acts, now visible, despite the foam of surface anxiety that usually hid them from view. I saw acts of love, one after another, and they were what, predominantly, I intended. It had been a beautiful life. When I got up, I was not reconciled, but calmer.
At a nearby French café, my philosopher friends, Michael and Edith Wyschogrod had scheduled a tea. “It’s cancer,” I answered their questioning looks, as I took the third seat at the round café table. Immediately, Michael and Edith said to regard it as a campaign, like others I had fought, and they outlined initial battle plans. After a time, I turned to Michael, who was a theologian I respected, as well as a philosopher.
“Michael, I know worse things have happened to better people, but would you mind telling me, WHY?”
“Our people are working on it,” he smiled, “and we should have something ready for publication soon.”
“What do the rabbis say?”
“When unmerited suffering comes, they first ask, ‘Have you studied Torah faithfully’?”
“Well, let’s allow philosophy to stand in for that.”
“Next they ask, ‘Have you committed any sins?’”
“No big ones lately.”
“And finally, if the first two questions have been answered satisfactorily, they offer a third explanation: the suffering of love. It’s God’s way to get closer to you.”
“I don’t wanna get any closer. I’m close enough.”
“When God wants to cuddle,” said Michael, “He doesn’t ask what’s on your agenda.”
Michael and Edith may not be able to join us, but I am delighted at the prospect of continuing this discussion over cups of tea. For now, a possible rephrase: “It’s God’s way of enabling you to get closer to Him.” Not to explain why there’s so much suffering on this planet, but rather the possibility that one might respond to it as an opportunity to pay attention to a different agenda than what one had before.
Judy, as always, many thanks. Your comment sheds added light on an experience on which it is hard to get light. The person ambushed by cancer hasn’t merely been interrupted & thwarted by a surd that formed no part of her expectations or plans. The afflicted person is also being offered an opportunity to ask, What is the plan in this? She might try to mine this experience for the hints and clues it contains. Especially since all these apparently scattered pieces of an unwelcome experience might add up to an important revision of her original plan, or to another plan. Such is the approach motivated by what one might call “intelligent hope.” Blessings.